| |
|
…What is art? Who is an artist? Why to make art?
Wasn’t enough art made already? Can I make art? What should it be
about? How should it look like? Should it make a statement? Political statement?
Ecological? Pedagogical? Should it be beautiful? What is ‘beautiful’?
What is the answer? Is there an answer? Am I able to search for it? What
if not? Shouldn’t I better become a housewife? A ‘perfect housewife’?
Who is a housewife? Who is a perfect housewife? What does she do? What does
she think? What does she feel? Can we take a look in her life? Through the
window? Aren’t curtains to thick to see clearly? So can we see, or
just imagine? Is it a secret? Does she have secrets? Is she like every woman
or the only one? Does she smile? Does she dream? Cry? Love? Compromise?
Regret? Hesitate? Wait? What is she waiting for? What does she do while
she is waiting? Does she agree? Does she understand? Is it a decision? What
kind of decision? For better and for worse? Is she a heroine? Is she a victim?
Does she wear Louise Bourgeois’ corset? Is she manifesting her feminism
like Martha Rosler? Does she belong on the photos of abused women by Cindy
Sherman? Is she angry? Bored? Lost? Indifferent? Happy? Conscious? Does
she know I am thinking about her? Is she important to me? Is she me? Do
I have a choice? What about her choice? Is she limited? Does she fantasize
about other ways of living? Is she holding the beginning of life? Is the
iron starting to live in her warm hands? Is she touched by the presence
of a meat grinder? Can she develop affection for the vacuum cleaner? How
to approach the object? Confront it? Experience it? Is the object a body?
What is the basic condition of an object then? Does an object ‘become’
only because of human perception? Is an iron ‘the iron’ only
by linguistic recognition? Does the existence of an object depend on a particular
time and space? What is time? What is space? Does time always depend on
space? Maybe it is the other way around? Can an object exist without time,
without space? Can an object ‘be’ just on its own? Does it change
its character? Purpose? Meaning? What is the meaning of the object? Must
it serve to carry water? Or preserve the ashes of the hero? Should it be
beautiful? Is it beautiful? Is it beautiful if it is not useful anymore?
Can the meat grinder be appreciated not for its purpose of grinding meat
but for its appearance? Shape? Colour? Structure? Smell? Personality? Deformations?
Defects? Do we need the wisdom of Marcel Duchamp to recognize the beauty
of common objects? Should we distinguish objects by giving them names to
consecrate them? Do we recognize ourselves in the mirror of our surrounding
objects? Is the reflection distorted? Have we ever observed a chair shifting
from one foot to another? Or a table bending its knees when very tired?
Are objects always correct? Or are we constantly instable? Are we intimidated
by the objects? Can we develop a relationship with them? How the relationship
changes if the object is multiplied? How much does it transform when talking
about gender identity? Do objects have a gender? Does the gender of an object
change in relation to other objects? How do we recognize it? Does it develop
together with circumstances? Or maybe objects have Duchamp’s wholeness
– unity of personality? Can objects be subjects? Participants? Members?
Are objects witnesses of Philip Guston’s social critique or just a
colourful background? Can they be symbols? What do they symbolize in the
art work of Richard Hamilton? Irony? Affluence? Fascination? Are they active?
Are they alive? What happens when they decompose like in Claes Oldenburg’s
cycle of life? And what’s remaining when the objects themselves are
gone? Do they leave traces? Can we chase them? Can we catch them? Rediscover?
Reconstruct? Rethink? Are they more interesting after all? More beautiful?...
25-02-2007
|
|